FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 17, 2003
Contact: Diane Pratt-Heavner(202) 226-7797
Davis to introduce bill requiring American Government and History for graduation.
Click here to read the bill.
TALLAHASSEE, FL - Today, Congressman Jim Davis (D-Tampa), joined by Democratic Leader of the Florida Senate, Ron Klein, and Democratic Leader of the Florida House, Doug Wiles, blasted the Florida Legislature for passing legislation allowing students to skip basic course work to graduate a year early. Davis promised to introduce a bill in Congress requiring states, as a condition for receiving federal education funds, to make American Government and History a graduation requirement.
The Florida law, passed this year in an attempt to skirt the state constitutional amendment mandating smaller class sizes, allows students to bypass American History and American Government, among other courses, and graduate in three years with just 18 credits instead of the usual 24 credits.
"I am appalled that as soldiers are fighting in Iraq to protect our freedoms, the Florida Legislature has decided that it is not important for students to learn how these freedoms were won in the first place," said Davis. "And are we really preparing our students to vote in their first election by allowing them to skip out on American History and Government?"
"As a parent, I am outraged that the Florida Legislature, Governor Bush and Commissioner Horne have not taken immediate action to remedy this failure. When I was in school, I had to take American Government, so I know the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from directly legislating school curriculum, but here is what I can do - when I return to Congress this week, I will introduce legislation that says that any state wishing to receive a Federal K-12 Education Block Grant under Title V-A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) must require high school students to take American History and Government before graduating."
For Fiscal Year 2003, Florida received $18.5 million in Title V-A funding.
A number of legislators and school board members have already lined up in support of U.S. Rep. Davis’ efforts: Sen. Ron Klein said, "The voters' mandate to lower class size didn't mean lowering our standards. American history shouldn't go the way of 7th periods, physical education, or summer school. Our children need to know the history of their country before stepping into its future."
"For us to compete in the modern economy, we must hold our students and our schools to the highest academic standards," said Rep. Doug Wiles. "Reducing high school graduation standards to allow students to finish in three years will make us less competitive with other states and nations."
"In my opinion the accelerated graduation plan puts our students at a disadvantage when applying for admission at colleges and universities. This is a time when we should be demanding more rigorous academics rather than less from our graduates." Harry G. Kinnan, Manatee County School Board
Jane Gallucci, Pinellas County School Board member, member of the Board of Directors for the National School Board Association and former President of Florida School Boards commented, "Clearly this Administration is sending the wrong message to all Florida high school students by not requiring American Government for graduation. All students must thoroughly understand how government works to be expected to defend the flag and the democracy it stands for."
"I am happy that Jim Davis is educating the Florida Legislature on how to educate our children," Tim Shea, Orange County School Board.
###
03- 68
Tuesday, November 18, 2003
Monday, November 17, 2003
Monday, November 3, 2003
Florida Statute 1008.25 Student Progression
1008.25 Public school student progression; remedial instruction; reporting requirements.--
(1) INTENT.--It is the intent of the Legislature that each student's progression from one grade to another be determined, in part, upon proficiency in reading, writing, science, and mathematics; that district school board policies facilitate such proficiency; and that each student and his or her parent be informed of that student's academic progress.
(2) COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM.--Each district school board shall establish a comprehensive program for student progression which must include:
(a) Standards for evaluating each student's performance, including how well he or she masters the performance standards approved by the State Board of Education.
(b) Specific levels of performance in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for each grade level, including the levels of performance on statewide assessments as defined by the commissioner, below which a student must receive remediation, or be retained within an intensive program that is different from the previous year's program and that takes into account the student's learning style.
(c) Appropriate alternative placement for a student who has been retained 2 or more years.
(3) ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES.--District school boards shall allocate remedial and supplemental instruction resources to students in the following priority:
(a) Students who are deficient in reading by the end of grade 3.
(b) Students who fail to meet performance levels required for promotion consistent with the district school board's plan for student progression required in paragraph (2)(b).
(4) ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION.--
(a) Each student must participate in the statewide assessment tests required by s. 1008.22. Each student who does not meet specific levels of performance as determined by the district school board in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for each grade level, or who does not meet specific levels of performance as determined by the commissioner on statewide assessments at selected grade levels, must be provided with additional diagnostic assessments to determine the nature of the student's difficulty and areas of academic need.
(b) The school in which the student is enrolled must develop, in consultation with the student's parent, and must implement an academic improvement plan designed to assist the student in meeting state and district expectations for proficiency. Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student has been identified as having a deficiency in reading, the academic improvement plan shall identify the student's specific areas of deficiency in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary; the desired levels of performance in these areas; and the instructional and support services to be provided to meet the desired levels of performance. Schools shall also provide for the frequent monitoring of the student's progress in meeting the desired levels of performance. District school boards shall assist schools and teachers to implement research-based reading activities that have been shown to be successful in teaching reading to low-performing students. Remedial instruction provided during high school may not be in lieu of English and mathematics credits required for graduation.
(c) Upon subsequent evaluation, if the documented deficiency has not been remediated in accordance with the academic improvement plan, the student may be retained. Each student who does not meet the minimum performance expectations defined by the Commissioner of Education for the statewide assessment tests in reading, writing, science, and mathematics must continue to be provided with remedial or supplemental instruction until the expectations are met or the student graduates from high school or is not subject to compulsory school attendance.
(5) READING DEFICIENCY AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.--
(a) It is the ultimate goal of the Legislature that every student read at or above grade level. Any student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading, based upon locally determined or statewide assessments conducted in kindergarten or grade 1, grade 2, or grade 3, or through teacher observations, must be given intensive reading instruction immediately following the identification of the reading deficiency. The student's reading proficiency must be reassessed by locally determined assessments or through teacher observations at the beginning of the grade following the intensive reading instruction. The student must continue to be provided with intensive reading instruction until the reading deficiency is remedied.
(b) Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student's reading deficiency, as identified in paragraph (a), is not remedied by the end of grade 3, as demonstrated by scoring at Level 2 or higher on the statewide assessment test in reading for grade 3, the student must be retained.
(c) Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, the parent of any student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading, as described in paragraph (a), must be notified in writing of the following:
1. That his or her child has been identified as having a substantial deficiency in reading.
2. A description of the current services that are provided to the child.
3. A description of the proposed supplemental instructional services and supports that will be provided to the child that are designed to remediate the identified area of reading deficiency.
4. That if the child's reading deficiency is not remediated by the end of grade 3, the child must be retained unless he or she is exempt from mandatory retention for good cause.
(6) ELIMINATION OF SOCIAL PROMOTION.--
(a) No student may be assigned to a grade level based solely on age or other factors that constitute social promotion.
(b) The district school board may only exempt students from mandatory retention, as provided in paragraph (5)(b), for good cause. Good cause exemptions shall be limited to the following:
1. Limited English proficient students who have had less than 2 years of instruction in an English for Speakers of Other Languages program.
2. Students with disabilities whose individual education plan indicates that participation in the statewide assessment program is not appropriate, consistent with the requirements of State Board of Education rule.
3. Students who demonstrate an acceptable level of performance on an alternative standardized reading assessment approved by the State Board of Education.
4. Students who demonstrate, through a student portfolio, that the student is reading on grade level as evidenced by demonstration of mastery of the Sunshine State Standards in reading equal to at least a Level 2 performance on the FCAT.
5. Students with disabilities who participate in the FCAT and who have an individual education plan or a Section 504 plan that reflects that the student has received the intensive remediation in reading, as required by paragraph (4)(b), for more than 2 years but still demonstrates a deficiency in reading and was previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, or grade 2.
6. Students who have received the intensive remediation in reading as required by paragraph (4)(b) for 2 or more years but still demonstrate a deficiency in reading and who were previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, or grade 2 for a total of 2 years. Intensive reading instruction for students so promoted must include an altered instructional day based upon an academic improvement plan that includes specialized diagnostic information and specific reading strategies for each student. The district school board shall assist schools and teachers to implement reading strategies that research has shown to be successful in improving reading among low performing readers.
(c) Requests for good cause exemptions for students from the mandatory retention requirement as described in subparagraphs (b)3. and 4. shall be made consistent with the following:
1. Documentation shall be submitted from the student's teacher to the school principal that indicates that the promotion of the student is appropriate and is based upon the student's academic record. In order to minimize paperwork requirements, such documentation shall consist only of the existing academic improvement plan, individual educational plan, if applicable, report card, or student portfolio.
2. The school principal shall review and discuss such recommendation with the teacher and make the determination as to whether the student should be promoted or retained. If the school principal determines that the student should be promoted, the school principal shall make such recommendation in writing to the district school superintendent. The district school superintendent shall accept or reject the school principal's recommendation in writing.
(7) ANNUAL REPORT.--
(a) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (5)(b), each district school board must annually report to the parent of each student the progress of the student toward achieving state and district expectations for proficiency in reading, writing, science, and mathematics. The district school board must report to the parent the student's results on each statewide assessment test. The evaluation of each student's progress must be based upon the student's classroom work, observations, tests, district and state assessments, and other relevant information. Progress reporting must be provided to the parent in writing in a format adopted by the district school board.
(b) Beginning with the 2001-2002 school year, each district school board must annually publish in the local newspaper, and report in writing to the State Board of Education by September 1 of each year, the following information on the prior school year:
1. The provisions of this section relating to public school student progression and the district school board's policies and procedures on student retention and promotion.
2. By grade, the number and percentage of all students in grades 3 through 10 performing at Levels 1 and 2 on the reading portion of the FCAT.
3. By grade, the number and percentage of all students retained in grades 3 through 10.
4. Information on the total number of students who were promoted for good cause, by each category of good cause as specified in paragraph (6)(b).
5. Any revisions to the district school board's policy on student retention and promotion from the prior year.
(8) STATE BOARD AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES.--
(a) The State Board of Education shall have authority as provided in s. 1008.32 to enforce this section.
(b) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 for the administration of this section.
(9) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.--The department shall provide technical assistance as needed to aid district school boards in administering this section.
History.--s. 371, ch. 2002-387.
(1) INTENT.--It is the intent of the Legislature that each student's progression from one grade to another be determined, in part, upon proficiency in reading, writing, science, and mathematics; that district school board policies facilitate such proficiency; and that each student and his or her parent be informed of that student's academic progress.
(2) COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM.--Each district school board shall establish a comprehensive program for student progression which must include:
(a) Standards for evaluating each student's performance, including how well he or she masters the performance standards approved by the State Board of Education.
(b) Specific levels of performance in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for each grade level, including the levels of performance on statewide assessments as defined by the commissioner, below which a student must receive remediation, or be retained within an intensive program that is different from the previous year's program and that takes into account the student's learning style.
(c) Appropriate alternative placement for a student who has been retained 2 or more years.
(3) ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES.--District school boards shall allocate remedial and supplemental instruction resources to students in the following priority:
(a) Students who are deficient in reading by the end of grade 3.
(b) Students who fail to meet performance levels required for promotion consistent with the district school board's plan for student progression required in paragraph (2)(b).
(4) ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION.--
(a) Each student must participate in the statewide assessment tests required by s. 1008.22. Each student who does not meet specific levels of performance as determined by the district school board in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for each grade level, or who does not meet specific levels of performance as determined by the commissioner on statewide assessments at selected grade levels, must be provided with additional diagnostic assessments to determine the nature of the student's difficulty and areas of academic need.
(b) The school in which the student is enrolled must develop, in consultation with the student's parent, and must implement an academic improvement plan designed to assist the student in meeting state and district expectations for proficiency. Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student has been identified as having a deficiency in reading, the academic improvement plan shall identify the student's specific areas of deficiency in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary; the desired levels of performance in these areas; and the instructional and support services to be provided to meet the desired levels of performance. Schools shall also provide for the frequent monitoring of the student's progress in meeting the desired levels of performance. District school boards shall assist schools and teachers to implement research-based reading activities that have been shown to be successful in teaching reading to low-performing students. Remedial instruction provided during high school may not be in lieu of English and mathematics credits required for graduation.
(c) Upon subsequent evaluation, if the documented deficiency has not been remediated in accordance with the academic improvement plan, the student may be retained. Each student who does not meet the minimum performance expectations defined by the Commissioner of Education for the statewide assessment tests in reading, writing, science, and mathematics must continue to be provided with remedial or supplemental instruction until the expectations are met or the student graduates from high school or is not subject to compulsory school attendance.
(5) READING DEFICIENCY AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.--
(a) It is the ultimate goal of the Legislature that every student read at or above grade level. Any student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading, based upon locally determined or statewide assessments conducted in kindergarten or grade 1, grade 2, or grade 3, or through teacher observations, must be given intensive reading instruction immediately following the identification of the reading deficiency. The student's reading proficiency must be reassessed by locally determined assessments or through teacher observations at the beginning of the grade following the intensive reading instruction. The student must continue to be provided with intensive reading instruction until the reading deficiency is remedied.
(b) Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student's reading deficiency, as identified in paragraph (a), is not remedied by the end of grade 3, as demonstrated by scoring at Level 2 or higher on the statewide assessment test in reading for grade 3, the student must be retained.
(c) Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, the parent of any student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading, as described in paragraph (a), must be notified in writing of the following:
1. That his or her child has been identified as having a substantial deficiency in reading.
2. A description of the current services that are provided to the child.
3. A description of the proposed supplemental instructional services and supports that will be provided to the child that are designed to remediate the identified area of reading deficiency.
4. That if the child's reading deficiency is not remediated by the end of grade 3, the child must be retained unless he or she is exempt from mandatory retention for good cause.
(6) ELIMINATION OF SOCIAL PROMOTION.--
(a) No student may be assigned to a grade level based solely on age or other factors that constitute social promotion.
(b) The district school board may only exempt students from mandatory retention, as provided in paragraph (5)(b), for good cause. Good cause exemptions shall be limited to the following:
1. Limited English proficient students who have had less than 2 years of instruction in an English for Speakers of Other Languages program.
2. Students with disabilities whose individual education plan indicates that participation in the statewide assessment program is not appropriate, consistent with the requirements of State Board of Education rule.
3. Students who demonstrate an acceptable level of performance on an alternative standardized reading assessment approved by the State Board of Education.
4. Students who demonstrate, through a student portfolio, that the student is reading on grade level as evidenced by demonstration of mastery of the Sunshine State Standards in reading equal to at least a Level 2 performance on the FCAT.
5. Students with disabilities who participate in the FCAT and who have an individual education plan or a Section 504 plan that reflects that the student has received the intensive remediation in reading, as required by paragraph (4)(b), for more than 2 years but still demonstrates a deficiency in reading and was previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, or grade 2.
6. Students who have received the intensive remediation in reading as required by paragraph (4)(b) for 2 or more years but still demonstrate a deficiency in reading and who were previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, or grade 2 for a total of 2 years. Intensive reading instruction for students so promoted must include an altered instructional day based upon an academic improvement plan that includes specialized diagnostic information and specific reading strategies for each student. The district school board shall assist schools and teachers to implement reading strategies that research has shown to be successful in improving reading among low performing readers.
(c) Requests for good cause exemptions for students from the mandatory retention requirement as described in subparagraphs (b)3. and 4. shall be made consistent with the following:
1. Documentation shall be submitted from the student's teacher to the school principal that indicates that the promotion of the student is appropriate and is based upon the student's academic record. In order to minimize paperwork requirements, such documentation shall consist only of the existing academic improvement plan, individual educational plan, if applicable, report card, or student portfolio.
2. The school principal shall review and discuss such recommendation with the teacher and make the determination as to whether the student should be promoted or retained. If the school principal determines that the student should be promoted, the school principal shall make such recommendation in writing to the district school superintendent. The district school superintendent shall accept or reject the school principal's recommendation in writing.
(7) ANNUAL REPORT.--
(a) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (5)(b), each district school board must annually report to the parent of each student the progress of the student toward achieving state and district expectations for proficiency in reading, writing, science, and mathematics. The district school board must report to the parent the student's results on each statewide assessment test. The evaluation of each student's progress must be based upon the student's classroom work, observations, tests, district and state assessments, and other relevant information. Progress reporting must be provided to the parent in writing in a format adopted by the district school board.
(b) Beginning with the 2001-2002 school year, each district school board must annually publish in the local newspaper, and report in writing to the State Board of Education by September 1 of each year, the following information on the prior school year:
1. The provisions of this section relating to public school student progression and the district school board's policies and procedures on student retention and promotion.
2. By grade, the number and percentage of all students in grades 3 through 10 performing at Levels 1 and 2 on the reading portion of the FCAT.
3. By grade, the number and percentage of all students retained in grades 3 through 10.
4. Information on the total number of students who were promoted for good cause, by each category of good cause as specified in paragraph (6)(b).
5. Any revisions to the district school board's policy on student retention and promotion from the prior year.
(8) STATE BOARD AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES.--
(a) The State Board of Education shall have authority as provided in s. 1008.32 to enforce this section.
(b) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 for the administration of this section.
(9) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.--The department shall provide technical assistance as needed to aid district school boards in administering this section.
History.--s. 371, ch. 2002-387.
LWV Lobbies DOE For Social Studies FCAT
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA
540 Beverly Court
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2506
V: 850/224-2545 Fax: 850/222-4485
E: lwvf@tfn.net www.naples.net/presents/lwvf
October 26, 2001
Mr. Jim Horne, Secretary of Education
Florida Board of Education
Turlington Building
Suite 1614
325 W. Gaines St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Dear Mr. Horne:
The League of Women Voters of Florida is aware that social studies is not included in the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. In this regard, the League has long lamented the fact that many adults, much less students, do not understand our three branches of government and how they function. Many young people do not understand the basic principles of constitutional government in America, its structure of checks and balances, and the interplay of its political parties and interest groups.
The last election crisis in Florida and the events of September 11 remind us of the great importance of citizenship preparation and foundational understandings of our government. Such knowledge provided to students now will produce future citizens who realize the importance of participating in shaping their communities as well as a global neighborhood. It appears that now, more than ever, this lack of knowledge should no longer continue. Preparing our youth to be responsible members of a democratic society is one of the most important missions of American education.
We wish to advise that the League of Women Voters of Florida strongly supports the inclusion of the Sunshine State Standards for Social Studies in the statewide FCAT assessment program. We sincerely ask you to support this issue before the legislature in their 2002 session.
Furthermore, it is noted that the Social Studies Program Specialist Position within the Florida Department of Education remains vacant. There is no doubt today about the importance of this vital position in our Department of Education. The League of Women Voters of Florida urges you to take whatever steps are necessary to fill this position at the earliest opportunity in order that oversight of teaching and testing of social studies in Florida can be properly maintained.
Sincerely,
Jane A. Gross
President
Cc: Mr. Jack Bovee, President
Florida Association of Social Studies Supervisors
(for an original copy of this letter, contact Jack Bovee)
540 Beverly Court
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2506
V: 850/224-2545 Fax: 850/222-4485
E: lwvf@tfn.net www.naples.net/presents/lwvf
October 26, 2001
Mr. Jim Horne, Secretary of Education
Florida Board of Education
Turlington Building
Suite 1614
325 W. Gaines St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Dear Mr. Horne:
The League of Women Voters of Florida is aware that social studies is not included in the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. In this regard, the League has long lamented the fact that many adults, much less students, do not understand our three branches of government and how they function. Many young people do not understand the basic principles of constitutional government in America, its structure of checks and balances, and the interplay of its political parties and interest groups.
The last election crisis in Florida and the events of September 11 remind us of the great importance of citizenship preparation and foundational understandings of our government. Such knowledge provided to students now will produce future citizens who realize the importance of participating in shaping their communities as well as a global neighborhood. It appears that now, more than ever, this lack of knowledge should no longer continue. Preparing our youth to be responsible members of a democratic society is one of the most important missions of American education.
We wish to advise that the League of Women Voters of Florida strongly supports the inclusion of the Sunshine State Standards for Social Studies in the statewide FCAT assessment program. We sincerely ask you to support this issue before the legislature in their 2002 session.
Furthermore, it is noted that the Social Studies Program Specialist Position within the Florida Department of Education remains vacant. There is no doubt today about the importance of this vital position in our Department of Education. The League of Women Voters of Florida urges you to take whatever steps are necessary to fill this position at the earliest opportunity in order that oversight of teaching and testing of social studies in Florida can be properly maintained.
Sincerely,
Jane A. Gross
President
Cc: Mr. Jack Bovee, President
Florida Association of Social Studies Supervisors
(for an original copy of this letter, contact Jack Bovee)
Mission Statement - FCSS EDUCATIONAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
(now the FASSS/FCSS Legislative Committee)
May 2001
Mission Statement (adapted from NCSS http://www.socialstudies.org/about/) :
Social studies educators teach students the content knowledge, intellectual skills, and civic values necessary for fulfilling the duties of citizenship in a participatory democracy. The mission of the Florida Council for the Social Studies is to provide leadership, service, and support for all social studies educators. FCSS is the largest association in the state devoted solely to social studies education, engaging and supporting educators in strengthening and advocating social studies. Membership is open to anyone with interest in the social studies.
Vision Statement : (adapted from NCSS)
“Social Studies is the study of the social sciences (history, geography, economics and government) and humanities to promote civic competence.”
Today’s social studies teachers help students to:
-- develop historic perspective and understand how things change and develop -- so they can make informed choices and decisions in the present.
-- understand how the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services is organized – so they can function effectively in an interdependent world economy.
-- understand the historical development of structures of power, authority, and governance and their evolving functions in contemporary society -- so they can develop civic competence.
May 2001
Mission Statement (adapted from NCSS http://www.socialstudies.org/about/) :
Social studies educators teach students the content knowledge, intellectual skills, and civic values necessary for fulfilling the duties of citizenship in a participatory democracy. The mission of the Florida Council for the Social Studies is to provide leadership, service, and support for all social studies educators. FCSS is the largest association in the state devoted solely to social studies education, engaging and supporting educators in strengthening and advocating social studies. Membership is open to anyone with interest in the social studies.
Vision Statement : (adapted from NCSS)
“Social Studies is the study of the social sciences (history, geography, economics and government) and humanities to promote civic competence.”
Today’s social studies teachers help students to:
-- develop historic perspective and understand how things change and develop -- so they can make informed choices and decisions in the present.
-- understand how the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services is organized – so they can function effectively in an interdependent world economy.
-- understand the historical development of structures of power, authority, and governance and their evolving functions in contemporary society -- so they can develop civic competence.
-- analyze the realities of global interdependence and connections – so they are prepred to find solutions to persisting and emerging global issues.
-- understand civic ideals and practices across time and in diverse societies – so they can participate fully in our society.
-- develop awareness of cultures – systems of beliefs, values and traditions – so they can relate to people in our nation and throughout the world.
-- to comprehend the formation, control and influences of institutions – so they can work through institutional change for the common good.
What Educational Goals Do We Support?
¨ The Sunshine State Standards for Social Studies should be added to the statewide FCAT assessment program. (FS 229.57 should thus be amended to include Social Studies). In asking for this, we are reminded that:
a. The Free Enterprise and Consumer Education Act (1974) constituted Florida’s first statewide assessment program.
b. Social Studies was added to the statewide Minimum Testing Program a decade ago, but this program was eliminated before the program could go into effect.
c. There is a vital need to assess civic competency in the face of Florida’s increasingly diverse student population.
d. Many districts are no longer providing K-12 instruction to children in social studies because it is not assessed on FCAT. This is a recipe for disaster!
¨ We recommend that the Program Specialist position within the Florida Department of Education be restored with a person who is social studies certified.
¨ We recommend that all reporting of Social Studies progress on the FCAT be reported in the subcategories of History, Geography, Economics, and Government – the four standards comprising the state curriculum.
¨ We recommend that funding from the legislature shall be categorically allocated to support the implementation of required instruction mandates so that needed resources and professional development may be provided to teachers to better enable them to teach these vital topics. This would ensure that students would have an in-depth understanding of the Constitution and the major documents which form the basis of our government, and would also make them familiar with the contributions that African Americans, Women, Hispanics, and Veterans have made to Florida and the United States.
a. currently few if any statewide resources exist for the above areas, despite their being mandated by law. Textual materials, by themselves, are insufficient to equip teachers with such resources. Finally, training institutes should be available to provide teachers with up-to-date materials and methodology to teach the mandates.
¨ We recommend that the Program Specialist position within the Florida Department of Education be restored with a person who is social studies certified.
¨ We recommend that all reporting of Social Studies progress on the FCAT be reported in the subcategories of History, Geography, Economics, and Government – the four standards comprising the state curriculum.
¨ We recommend that funding from the legislature shall be categorically allocated to support the implementation of required instruction mandates so that needed resources and professional development may be provided to teachers to better enable them to teach these vital topics. This would ensure that students would have an in-depth understanding of the Constitution and the major documents which form the basis of our government, and would also make them familiar with the contributions that African Americans, Women, Hispanics, and Veterans have made to Florida and the United States.
a. currently few if any statewide resources exist for the above areas, despite their being mandated by law. Textual materials, by themselves, are insufficient to equip teachers with such resources. Finally, training institutes should be available to provide teachers with up-to-date materials and methodology to teach the mandates.
b. the legislature and Department of Education should use the model formerly utilized to address the lack of materials about the HOLOCAUST for these additional mandated areas.
¨ We recommend that the FS 232.245 regarding “pupil progression, remedial instruction, and reporting requirements” be amended to include social studies.
As a core curriculum area, social studies instruction provides a rich basis for student learning and has as its goal the application of knowledge and attitudes to enable students to learn civic responsibility. Without a foundation in each of the four major areas represented in the Sunshine State Standards for social studies, a student’s education is incomplete. As so many recent surveys can attest, we can no longer afford the luxury of assuming students are learning about the heritage of our nation or that they possess the essential economic, civic, geographic and historic competencies to equip them for the role they will ALL assume upon graduation – that of citizen!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
