Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Calling Senator Byrd's Bluff! Sept. 2005

(Sent to major newspapers in Virginia and Florida at the time Senator Byrd introduced and Congress passed legislation requiring every institution receiving federal funds to implement a Civic Education program with employees on or around September 17th of each year. The article attempted to point out the continued passage of meaningless laws at the state and national level would not do as much as periodically holding the separate states accountable for how well they prepare students with the requisite skills and knowledge for citizenship. After asking editors to possibly devote space to the complex issue, the author argued, "It is a national tragedy what is happening in Congress and the possible consequence is of such importance that it necessitates some depth in coverage. Feel free, of course, to edit as you need." It is not known if papers printed the article or not.

Calling Senator Byrd’s Bluff
Sept. 12, 2005 - (Sent to major newspapers in Virginia and Florida)

I had the pleasure of watching Sen. Robert Byrd deliver on C-SPAN a rousing and emotional Constitution Day speech on September 16th at Shepherd University in West Virginia. As the sponsor of the bill it was very appropriate. The senator intoned how government requires an informed citizenry. His remarks were laced with the wisdom of such great statesmen as Cicero, our Founders, Daniel Webster and even Ronald Reagan. The audience chuckled when he related how the ‘Great Communicator’ once remarked “government is like a baby’s elementary canal – it has a hearty appetite on one end and no responsibility on the other.” Warming to the occasion, he lamented that our calendars generally do not specify “Constitution Day” on their page for September, yet they never fail to point out the phases of the moon or the First Day of Spring. He got another round of chuckles when he pointed out that Americans more often take their cars to Jiffy Lube than vote. He then soberly asked the audience how long the nation, just like any other machine that requires constant vigilance and periodic maintenance, could be expected to endure when we care more about our cars than our responsibilities as citizens? The laughter ended rather abruptly.

Now I’m all for giving the nation a good civics lesson. Heaven knows we sure need one. But when haven’t we? Survey after survey for over 30 years has demonstrated this. My generation remembers how stunned Americans were to see Chief Justice Warren Burger resign from one of the highest positions of power in the nation to become honorary Chairman of the Bicentennial of the Constitution Commission. He did so, he said, to give the nation a very-much needed lesson in civics. Nothing’s changed much. Warren is no longer with us when we desperately need him and only the names of the surveys have changed.

Back to Senator Byrd. It was a wonderful speech but I remain opposed to Constitution Day. I oppose it as an educator who has put more than 30 years into teaching about the Constitution because I’m tired of national leaders and Congressmen who can easily appropriate hundreds of millions of dollars to train teachers of U.S. History and Civics to do their jobs better, but then can’t find a measly $10 million to hold states accountable for how well they prepare their students in these subjects. Senate Bill 860, which was aimed at ending the second-class status of Civics and U.S. History on NAEP, often referred to as the Nation’s Report Card, is languishing in Congress and will probably die again. No one noticed when it’s sponsor Lamar Alexander stated U.S. History is our worst subject. It died in the last Congress without a hearing. Although it recently had a hearing and noted historian David McCullough spoke to the Senators about the civic crisis the nation faces, it will probably die again. Interestingly, this NAEP bill would only fund enough to know how students perform in up to 10 states. We compare all 50 in all the other subjects! Is this the best that Congress can do -- spend a half BILLION dollars training teachers and pass Constitution Day while continuing to ignore holding states accountable for one of the most important reasons for public education?

Why is S860 important? Because without it, Governors like Florida’s Jeb Bush can talk about the importance of imbuing students with civic knowledge while actually remaining hostile to it. Governor Bush sits on the Education Commission of the States whose subsidiary group, the National Center for Learning and Citizenship works to improve civic education programs. He’s also an “Honorary Member of Constitution Day, Inc.” Civic educators in Florida, however, know the truth. He signed into law a measure a few years back that eliminated American History, American Government and Economics as graduation courses for all Florida students. For years, his legislature leaders have stymied attempts by civic educators to require that student performance in Civics and History be allowed to be taken into consideration when children are reviewed for promotion from one grade to the next. The measure, which once was passed by the entire House and which never had one vote cast in opposition to it in the Senate, was killed by legislative leaders because it was on a fast track for approval.

Why? Because it appears that some feared that it might, someday, somehow, in some way by some future legislature be interpreted as meaning these courses should be added to the states’ assessment program. [How anyone could arrive at that conclusion is amazing. It’s a totally separate statute that was NOT addressed in the measure.] Civic educators in Florida know that Jeb Bush and his statewide legislative leaders oppose adding these vital subjects to the state-wide assessment program. This is, by the way, completely contrary to the stated goals of the ECS and NCLC of which Jeb is a proud member and “Director”.

Nevertheless, Jeb has endorsed the wide-scale sampling of students in our state -- 70,000 of them a couple of years ago -- on very intrusive Drug, Tobacco and Alcohol Surveys that contains literally hundreds of questions. Thus, Florida can know with scientific accuracy when the last time a typical student in a middle school was offered a swig of beer, a 'joint' -- or something worse. Sadly, the Governor has ignored the only study ever conducted in the state to assess students’ civic understanding and which has demonstrated that Florida's University students are more ignorant of basic civic knowledge than their peers across the nation. Of course, with regard to K-12 public education, such understandings are anyone’s guess! Things were so bad that Florida Congressman Jim Davis, now a Gubernatorial Candidate to replace Jeb, actually introduced a bill in Congress to punish his own state with a loss of federal education funds because of its hostile attitude toward civic education. Finally, when asked to break the legislative logjam on an important civic education measure two years ago, direct pleas to Governor Bush fell upon deaf ears. Amazingly, the honorary titles for his keen sense of civic-mindedness keep coming.

This brings us back to Senator Byrd’s “Constitution Day”. Congress needs to pass this bill that would begin to place civic and historical understanding on an equitable standing with other core curriculum subjects. Then, states like Florida won’t be able to hide in a cloak of total civic ignorance. Senator Byrd and his colleagues can do better. Only the very survival of this Republic hangs in the balance.

The writer has been a social studies educator, a former elementary school principal, and serves as Legislative Chair for the Florida Council for the Social Studies. He may be reached at
JSBovee@aol.com.

Jack Bovee
319 Fifth Avenue
Lehigh Acres, FL 33972
Ph: 239-369-1297 cell: 239-272-3508
Email: JSBovee@aol.com

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Constitution Day Consternations - 2005 Editorial

Social Studies teachers have a plethora of calendar dates which provide excellent opportunities for us to submit 'timely' guest editorials to the print media on a wide variety of topics. Here is one sample which used the September "Constitution Day" federal requirement to grab the attention of Florida legislators convening in Tallahassee in the fall during the time that many submit bills prior to the opening of the session.
__________________________________________________________

Constitution Day Consternations
Jack Bovee, Sept. 16, 2005

This September 17 marks the first annual requirement -- sponsored by Senator Robert Byrd (Dem. WV) -- that all schools implement a program to instruct students about the Constitution. As one who has dedicated his adult life to that endeavor let me go on record as being strongly opposed to this law.


Why? Because there is a better law which both the Senate and the media continue to ignore. It’s time for Congress to finally pass some substantive legislation that would restore American History and Civics as part of the nation’s core curriculum. It’s time to place these subjects at least on an equitable footing with others that are assessed by what is commonly referred to as “The Nations Report Card”. How? By holding states accountable for how well they prepare our students to be citizens – by comparing them to one another and to a national average -- just as we do in reading, writing, math and science. What? We don’t do that already, you say? Of course we don’t. And that’s the reason for the drastic decline in civic knowledge for over the last 30 years!

Believe it or not, American History and Civics have been repeatedly discriminated against in the testing process and postponed on the national testing calendar. For decades, we’ve compared all the states to one another in reading, writing, math and science. Governors and Education Commissioners post bragging rights on their web sites when their states do better than the national average and they appropriate huge sums of money to remedy their academic deficiencies. The U.S. Department of Education even compares how well they effectively deter students from using drugs, alcohol or tobacco. In history and civics, however, we simply don’t care enough to even keep score. Nor does anyone seem to care! Look in earnest through the words of Diane Ravitch, Chester Finn, Charles Quigley and others for any articles in support of state accountability or for support for a revitalized NAEP, and you’ll be searching in vain.


When Charles Smith, Executive Director of the National Assessment Governing Board, recently testified to the Senate about the importance of U.S. History and how dismally our students perform in it, he bragged that under a ‘new’ testing calendar, U.S. History would be assessed more often. Good. It needs to be. What he forgot to mention, however, was that it was the plan of his own shop only a couple of years ago to basically eliminate testing this subject on future NAEP tests at Grade 12. Nor did he mention President Bush supported the evisceration of these subjects at the very grade when schools are registering students to vote. You can bet no one asked him why this plan was even proposed for a course in which our students ‘perform worst’. Nor did anyone have the foresight to ask Secretary Spellings about her plans to restore Civic and Historical Knowledge to the nation’s schools during her confirmation process. Can it be that no one cares?

Sadly, Senate Bill 860 -- which is designed to shed some light and accountability on the subject-- continues to languish in Congress. It died in the last Congress and appears doomed to die in this one. David McCullough’s appearance some weeks ago before the Senate on this bill apparently did very little to stir them into action. This is the subject that provides the “glue” which holds the nation together. Politicians love to point out that we are not united by a common religion, ethnicity, race or even perhaps now, language. It’s this ‘love of our sacred documents’, our understanding of how ‘America has served as a beacon of liberty to countless others around the globe’, and the realization of the ‘sacrifice of countless others’ who have preceded us that unifies us as a people. Sure, right. Read the reports over the last 20 years and tell me if anyone really thinks that Senator Byrd’s generation – or mine, for that matter – have kept the promise to properly provide young Americans today with the requisite knowledge and skills for citizenship.

Congress has been able to appropriate about a half billion (that’s with a “B”) dollars to train teachers to do a better job teaching American History, yet it can’t agree to pass a bill that would authorize a measly $10 million to end the second-class status this subject has in the U.S. Department of Education and in the 50 states. They can’t seem to pass a bill that would actually hold states accountable for what used to be the basic reason for a public education. As a result, we know with more scientific accuracy when the last time a typical middle school student in Michigan took a swig of beer than we do about that student’s knowledge of our Constitution. Why is this? You’ll have to ask Senator Byrd and his peers.

This isn’t rocket science – nor is it a novel idea. Surveys have been reporting these findings since Chief Justice Warren Burger’s “national civics lesson” in the 1970s. Thank goodness Burger, like the Founders, isn’t around today to see just how bad things have become. McCullough worries about this very real threat to America’s security and future. Like him, I’m very worried whether today’s young adults possess even the rudimentary knowledge to keep the Republic going when the mantle of authority is passed on to them. A Roper Survey in 2002 found Americans aged 18 to 24 coming in last or second to last when compared to their peers from among eight other nations in such things as: the ability to identify the location of our country on a world map, knowing the approximate size of the U.S. population, being able to identify what two nations each have over 1 billion people, or even knowing which of our enemies took credit for the slaughter of over 3,000 innocent Americans only months before. Mexican students beat their American counterparts on all of those questions. Perhaps we can just extend our right of franchise south of the border.

Without some form of accountability, states will continue to relegate civic knowledge to the educational backburner. Take Florida for example. Governor Jeb Bush and several of Florida’s leading legislators serve as ‘state directors’ to the Education Commission of the States. As such, they also serve on its subsidiary group -- the National Center for Learning and Citizenship. Both are charged with improving Civic Education programs. While serving in this capacity, Jeb Bush signed into law a few years ago an act that eliminated American History, American Government, and Economics as graduation requirements in Florida. Incensed, Tampa Congressman Jim Davis immediately introduced HR 3592 in the last Congress to threaten his own state with the loss of federal funds. It took a battle, but these courses were eventually restored as graduation requirements.

Why would Jeb Bush do such a thing? For the same reason the President delayed the Civics N.A.E.P. assessment some years ago. If no one keeps score – who cares? Funny, but I never hear anyone at the national level point out to the President or his younger brother that things such as non-accountability, the second-class status given to civic knowledge, advocating the elimination of such assessments at grade 12 or eradicating such courses as graduation requirements might actually give folks the impression that civic knowledge isn’t very important!

Let’s hope that Congress will not blow another chance to hold still yet another generation of young Americans and their state leaders accountable for what is the most important mission of public education! Perhaps if they got behind the Alexander bill, we could begin to treat these subjects equitably. Some state leaders might even take their responsibilities as ‘national directors’ and guardians of civic knowledge more seriously. And perhaps, if we’re lucky, we’ll begin to work on improving the glue that might actually hold this nation together in the future.

The writer has been a social studies educator, a former elementary school principal, and serves as Legislative Chair for the Florida Council for the Social Studies. He may be reached at
JSBovee@aol.com.

Word Count – 1313
Jack Bovee, 319 Fifth Avenue
Lehigh Acres, Florida 33972
Ph: 239-369-1397 Email: JSBovee@aol.com


Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The Need for Civic Learning

CAMPAIGN FOR THE CIVIC MISSION OF SCHOOLS

No Child Left Behind (ESEA) Reauthorization


The Need for Civic Learning[*]

American democracy depends on preparing our young people to be citizens who understand their rights and responsibilities and have the knowledge, skill and motivation to participate in the civic and political life of the nation. This civic mission – serving the needs of a democracy – was a central reason for establishing our system of free public schools. Recent test and survey data show that we are not getting the job done:

· In the 2001 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test[†] of United States history, more students scored below “basic” in history than in any other subject tested, including mathematics, science, and reading: 33% in grade 4 scored below basic; 36% in grade 8; and 57% in grade 12.

· On the last (1998) NAEP civics assessment in 1998 only 15% of 4th-graders were able to name two services that the government provides; just 6% of 8th-graders could describe two advantages of having a constitution; only 9% of 12th-graders could list two ways a democratic society benefits from citizen participation.

· The long term effect of neglecting this part of public education is apparent in a recent survey by the American Bar Association that revealed only 52% of adults were able to identify the three branches of government.

· The 1998 NAEP civics assessment produced scores for 12th graders below basic for 27% of Whites, 58% of African Americans, 56% of Hispanics, 34% of Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 56% of American Indians and showed that disadvantaged students were least likely to have strong civic learning experiences in school.

As our nation becomes more diverse, schools provide the essential opportunity for disadvantaged students in particular to develop the skills needed for civic participation. A federal education law that seeks to close achievement gaps surely should address the gap that exists in the schools’ performance in educating for democracy. We need to do better, and we can.

We know what works. The 2003 report The Civic Mission of Schools[‡] lays out both outcomes for students – the knowledge, skills and attitudes essential for effective participation in our democracy – and a variety of proven strategies for schools to help students achieve them.

Civic Learning and No Child Left Behind

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 (NCLB) focused our nation’s educational improvement and accountability efforts on the necessary work of closing persistent achievement gaps in reading and mathematics. The law also has profound implications for civic learning and needs to be modified to better support the civic mission of schools.

First, what's tested often is what's taught. NCLB requires tests in reading, mathematics, and science. A recent study by the Center on Education Policy suggests most school districts are cutting back on subjects like social studies, civics, and American history and government to concentrate on the tested subjects.

Civic learning should be incorporated into the required assessments in elementary and secondary grades, but with no net increase in overall testing. We also should recognize that current standardized tests are not well suited to get beyond factual knowledge to measure civic skills, values and attitudes; states should be able to use other means to measure those aspects of civic learning.

Second, current law does not address the special challenges facing civic learning in curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional development. We should seize the opportunity to embed history, social studies, and civic content in curriculum and instruction in other content areas, particularly in reading, using civic learning content to advance existing NCLB goals. The federal government should back research to confirm the view of several prominent authorities that teaching history and social studies can enhance student performance in reading.

Revisions to NCLB should strengthen teacher training and professional development in social studies, civics and content-based reading. Increased NCLB funding should be available for undergraduate preparation and in-service professional development to improve teaching in social studies, history, civics, and community-based civic learning and to prepare teachers of reading and literature to include historical and civic material.

Third, NCLB needs a mechanism to encourage student engagement in extracurricular and community-based civic learning experiences. These approaches can support broader NCLB achievement and reform goals.

Therefore, a revised ESEA should also help schools to enhance extracurricular and community-based civic learning opportunities and to see civic learning and youth engagement as part of high school reform. Civic engagement has positive effects on student performance by strengthening relationships with the community, providing some real world context for students’ classroom learning, and building character and self-esteem. NCLB should encourage youth engagement activities validated by research that make staying in school more meaningful and so can help improve graduation rates.

* * * *

As the nation’s blueprint for education reform, NCLB must address the civic mission of schools. Too much is at stake for us to leave the educational grounding of our democracy up to chance. Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor puts it this way, “Knowledge about the ideas embodied in the Constitution and the ways in which it shapes our lives is not passed down from generation to generation through the gene pool. If must be learned anew by each generation.”
[*] We use the term “civic learning” to encompass the several subject areas essential to educating for democracy – history, civics, government, law, geography, economics – and to connote the range of both classroom instruction and experiential approaches, e.g., simulations, co- and extra-curricular activities and service learning.
[†] Results of the 2006 NAEP assessments in history and in civics are expected to be available early in 2007.
[‡] Carnegie Corporation of New York and CIRCLE, The Civic Mission of Schools (2003)

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Sunday, January 7, 2007

Tallahassee Legislative Symposium Invitation - 2007

January 6, 2007

Dear Supporter of Citizenship Education,

The Florida Council for Social Studies is hosting a regional conference Saturday Feb.3 at Tallahassee Community College for all social studies teachers of north Florida. We need your help and we need your advice. The mission of the Florida Council for the Social Studies is citizenship education. Although the current Sunshine State Standards provide objectives for citizenship education, the reality is that for too many students in too many school districts, citizenship education is not a priority.

We would like to have the opportunity to share some of our ideas and utilize your expertise to make citizenship education a priority for our students.

Please join us at a reception to share your thoughts and advice

Friday, February 2, 2007
4:30 to 6:30 pm

Mary Brogan Museum
Lottery Room
350 S. Duval Street
Tallahassee Florida

The Florida Council for the Social Studies looks forward to
meeting you.

Sincerely,


Sally S. Day
Director Emeritus
Florida Council for the Social Studies

Please R.S.V.P.
sasday@tampabay.rr.com or 727.531.0857